Originally posted by xavier1979:
My feel:
What we need is an open environment, where we are free to challenge each other's allegations, and to refute them based on facts and the truth.
It is all too easy to sue the other for defamation instead.
You got it right.
If the original article is based on facts and the truth, then there would not be any defamation to start with.
The trouble is, most of the time, it is just statement (kopi shop talk) with out checking of fact that is being presented. We expect to fish out truth from "somebody or organisation" affected. Instead we get defamation suit in return. We are asking for it.
These are just my opinion.