do u think boys' uniform should just stay the same?
-
I mean,don’t bother to swap to long pants at sec 3,just leave it as school shirt and shorts.that way save the hassle of getting new clothes if the old ones still fit.the weather here is so hot,n getting hotter,like that more comfortable and easier to move about.also I think it looks better.girls don’t have to change attire,so boys shouldn’t have to too.
-
Sooner or later guys will have to learn to wear long pants to work. Besides, it looks more presentable than it is to wear shorts. Would you go for a debate in shorts? Would you go for a presentation in shorts? Its inappropriate and makes you look like a primary school kid. Would you like to go around being called didi?
If you wanna talk about comfort and easiness of moving about, theres no difference between the two really. Its just your mind making you think and feel that way.
-
Eeyer....then all the girls in your school will have to endure the disgusting sight of curly leg hairs flowing and waving like lallang in the wind.
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
Eeyer....then all the girls in your school will have to endure the disgusting sight of curly leg hairs flowing and waving like lallang in the wind.
Some girls got hairy legs, hand and even a mustache.
-
Originally posted by Deino:
Some girls got hairy legs, hand and even a mustache.
lol u find one and show me hor kthx
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
Eeyer....then all the girls in your school will have to endure the disgusting sight of curly leg hairs flowing and waving like lallang in the wind.
leg hairs so early in age?i didnt have that even in sec 4.ur not going for any formal presentation in executive meeting,ur all just schoolkids then.and whats so unpresentable about that?it wouldnt be part of the attire in the 1st place if it were so
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
lol u find one and show me hor kthx
Singapore so small...walk around and open your eyes lol..ofcourse not as thick as male hairs la. Girls with mustache are a real turn off..
-
Originally posted by Fabrizzo:
leg hairs so early in age?i didnt have that even in sec 4.ur not going for any formal presentation in executive meeting,ur all just schoolkids then.and whats so unpresentable about that?it wouldnt be part of the attire in the 1st place if it were so
you must be a late bloomer.
lol
Anywayz, what's the point of complaining here?
Go and petition la!
-
Originally posted by Deino:
Singapore so small...walk around and open your eyes lol..ofcourse not as thick as male hairs la. Girls with mustache are a real turn off..
Me nv see any bearded ladies ard.
Anywayz OT liaoz
-
Originally posted by Fabrizzo:
leg hairs so early in age?i didnt have that even in sec 4.ur not going for any formal presentation in executive meeting,ur all just schoolkids then.and whats so unpresentable about that?it wouldnt be part of the attire in the 1st place if it were so
you're telling me you reached puberty at the age of 16? Thats quite late dude. Most kids already start growing hair by P6...
School kids you say? At the age of 15 you should already start learning to become an adult and learn to be more presentable.
At that age your dick already got weed growing, you are representing your school when you wear your school uniform. That is something you should be looking presentable for at the least. You are supposed to give the impression of maturity and not the other way around..Teenagers want adult to treat them like adults but the impression some of them give is much rather the opposite. So do they really want to be treated as adults of schoolkids?
Unless its your school I suggest you deal with it. Your main reason for asking is becoz of comfort and preference. If you don't feel like a more mature kid wearing long pants to school then its you against most of society. Sometimes we fail to see things becoz we choose wot we see. I don't really blame you.
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
Me nv see any bearded ladies ard.
Anywayz OT liaoz
Neither have I haha..But i've definitely seen ladies with mustache though not as thick as men's.
Note: Mustache is the hair that grow above your mouth and below your nose lol.
-
Originally posted by Deino:
Neither have I haha..But i've definitely seen ladies with mustache though not as thick as men's.
Note: Mustache is the hair that grow above your mouth and below your nose lol.
lol
me nv see any gals with hilter moustaches either
Eh means u scrutinise their upper lips ah?
0.o
-
Originally posted by littlemissbonkers:
lol
me nv see any gals with hilter moustaches either
Eh means u scrutinise their upper lips ah?
0.o
LOL...no la...one random look can see liao mah..haha
-
Long pants definately looks better and more presentable. May i ask, how does wearing long pants restrict your movements? You wanna do karate kicks in sec school?
-
pls lah, even keep to shorts oso must change wat.......
-
Originally posted by GoldChampagne:
Long pants definately looks better and more presentable. May i ask, how does wearing long pants restrict your movements? You wanna do karate kicks in sec school?
on the contrary,i feel that school shorts pair with the current school shirt better,n definitely match the PE t-shirt more nicely when in pe top school bottom attire.long pants will definitely restrict one way or another.when u bend down to get something,or have to run,friction between ur legs n the pants when u bend,or in the toilet.are u saying we look unpresentable from pri 1 to sec 2?i dont see girls worrying their shirt isnt made longer to be presentable.besides,despite how u claim u want to be viewed as more matured,u are still subjected to the same rules n requirements.if u get punished it looks more embarassing if u are in long pants than if ur still in shorts.at least thats how i feel....also i do not see any bearing between maturity n length of clothes.
well,at least thats all of what i think....
-
Originally posted by Fabrizzo:
on the contrary,i feel that school shorts pair with the current school shirt better,n definitely match the PE t-shirt more nicely when in pe top school bottom attire.long pants will definitely restrict one way or another.when u bend down to get something,or have to run,friction between ur legs n the pants when u bend,or in the toilet.are u saying we look unpresentable from pri 1 to sec 2?i dont see girls worrying their shirt isnt made longer to be presentable.besides,despite how u claim u want to be viewed as more matured,u are still subjected to the same rules n requirements.if u get punished it looks more embarassing if u are in long pants than if ur still in shorts.at least thats how i feel....also i do not see any bearing between maturity n length of clothes.
well,at least thats all of what i think....
I think young adults,still looks nicer in long pants,boys now are very tall in sec 3,wearing shorts is not very nice,by the way,what does you means wearing long pants get punished very embarassing.?
-
no
-
You know the number of boys who wanted to wear long pants anot?
Trust me, you will be amazed.
When a sec 2 boy finish his academic year, he look forward to sec 3 not because of school.
Because of the long pants.
Don't believe? ask around.
-
Originally posted by gunner77:
You know the number of boys who wanted to wear long pants anot?
Trust me, you will be amazed.
When a sec 2 boy finish his academic year, he look forward to sec 3 not because of school.
Because of the long pants.
Don't believe? ask around.
i find that very amusing,n cant understand why they'd feel like that.
sec 3 boys arent that big,at least not all are.for me long pants looked abit awkward,shorts seem to suit better then.but i do like the white pants too.
-
Originally posted by Fabrizzo:
i find that very amusing,n cant understand why they'd feel like that.
sec 3 boys arent that big,at least not all are.for me long pants looked abit awkward,shorts seem to suit better then.but i do like the white pants too.
thats why you will never understand why. becoz its either you don't want to or you still have the mentality of a 12 year old.
to you shorts seems better but to majority of people long pants is better. so if you look at that perspective, there must be something wrong with your way of thinking because in every single one of your post, you tell us you cannot understand.
You already show us your problem when you said "i find that very amusing,n cant understand why they'd feel like that."
Your inability to understand something so simple would most likely be that you're mentally retarded.
-
Originally posted by Fabrizzo:
i find that very amusing,n cant understand why they'd feel like that.
sec 3 boys arent that big,at least not all are.for me long pants looked abit awkward,shorts seem to suit better then.but i do like the white pants too.
How old are you?You must see things on a teenage mindset.
You compare those sec 3,4,5 kids wearing long pants from any other secondary school and those sec3,4 kids from River valley high school which wear short pants all the way.
They look so stupid with short pants.
-
Originally posted by Deino:
thats why you will never understand why. becoz its either you don't want to or you still have the mentality of a 12 year old.
to you shorts seems better but to majority of people long pants is better. so if you look at that perspective, there must be something wrong with your way of thinking because in every single one of your post, you tell us you cannot understand.
You already show us your problem when you said "i find that very amusing,n cant understand why they'd feel like that."
Your inability to understand something so simple would most likely be that you're mentally retarded.
deino,i find u extremely offensive.how sure are u that u arent the one whos retarded?to me i think its ur ignorance which is laughable.i thought i can have a civil discussion with u guys,obviously not,u dont have the maturity to talk about things which arent in ur norm even though it makes more sense.n gunner,who are u to call rv boys stupid?they look great in that unique uniform,i kinda envy them at times.ur desperation to wear long pants to hide ur legs for god knows what reason's the one which is mockable.calling people stupid n retarded,now thats sensible n matured for u?gimme a break!u just insulted urselves by being so rudely extremist
-
Originally posted by Fabrizzo:
deino,i find u extremely offensive.how sure are u that u arent the one whos retarded?to me i think its ur ignorance which is laughable.i thought i can have a civil discussion with u guys,obviously not,u dont have the maturity to talk about things which arent in ur norm even though it makes more sense.n gunner,who are u to call rv boys stupid?they look great in that unique uniform,i kinda envy them at times.ur desperation to wear long pants to hide ur legs for god knows what reason's the one which is mockable.calling people stupid n retarded,now thats sensible n matured for u?gimme a break!u just insulted urselves by being so rudely extremist
My post might look offensive from different perspectives.
But like I said, if you cannot understand it in the majority's point of view, doesn't it mean you are mentally retarded? I'm using words as what they mean here and not as insults. And yes we are having a civil discussion.
Throughout all of my posts I have been point out to you what majority of guys feel and you call that amusing. Its like you're in a world of your own. You can't seem to try and stick your head out of the box even.
Would it be wrong if i use the word mentally retarded for anyone who can't seem to absorb what majority of people can understand?
I can definitely understand a person's preference for shorts. Do you have fetish for legs? Coz it seems now you're point at a different direction about our desperation to hide our legs. We're not desperate to hide our legs. Its about the pants here and not our legs dude.
I don't think at the pace you're going have you any right at all to talk about norms.
-
I agree with deino
You fail to see things from a different perspective.