Originally posted by laurence82:
to me its relatively easy to catch such trollwhatever it takes, always remain clear and focused on your original point/question
you can see that it will frustrate BIC's intention to skip and divert his argument that he has nothing else to do but to take cheap personal shots at you
The christian trolls sgdiehard, BIC and Badzmaro are all ready at any second and minute to personal attack, this is what they do best. Such is unchristianlike. They all share the same character of easily bruised ego. They come here to do all they can to make themselves feel good, sinning ! hahahah! If you point out their ways, they feel you have touched their raw flesh and put in even more effort to continue to attack.
Uncalled for beings have no place in heaven.
Originally posted by winsomeea:
The christian trolls sgdiehard, BIC and Badzmaro are all ready at any second and minute to personal attack, this is what they do best. Such is unchristianlike. They all share the same character of easily bruised ego. They come here to do all they can to make themselves feel good, sinning ! hahahah! If you point out their ways, they feel you have touched their raw flesh and put in even more effort to continue to attack.Uncalled for beings have no place in heaven.
You got anything to say about the constitutional matters of singapore ? Or are u gonna be like Laurence82 who does not know jack shit until someone forcefull shows him he does not know the subject matter at all ?
So you are God now ?
Who is feeling good now. People like you coming in making generalisation comments on christians ?
I dun think there will ever be such a law....
The government will never ban religious evangelism, whether it's by buddhists, hindus, muslims or christians.
But the govt has investigated and charged religious people before for evangelism that incites hate.
Last year, a christian couple was jailed for distributing material that tears down Islam and Catholicism.
2 pastors were also warned about inciting hate in their sermons.
Actually I dont agree to the police always meddling in our speech but in the context of Singapore and to preserve secularity, it might be the only good way to keep the over-zealous religious in check
Originally posted by Tcmc:The government will never ban religious evangelism, whether it's by buddhists, hindus, muslims or christians.
But the govt has investigated and charged religious people before for evangelism that incites hate.
Last year, a christian couple was jailed for distributing material that tears down Islam and Catholicism.
2 pastors were also warned about inciting hate in their sermons.
Actually I dont agree to the police always meddling in our speech but in the context of Singapore and to preserve secularity, it might be the only good way to keep the over-zealous religious in check
Yes, SG can be very strict against that....
Originally posted by winsomeea:
The christian trolls sgdiehard, BIC and Badzmaro are all ready at any second and minute to personal attack, this is what they do best. Such is unchristianlike. They all share the same character of easily bruised ego. They come here to do all they can to make themselves feel good, sinning ! hahahah! If you point out their ways, they feel you have touched their raw flesh and put in even more effort to continue to attack.Uncalled for beings have no place in heaven.
Totally agree
They dont care about arguments, debate or dare i say Christianity
They just want to go around trolling other forumers
Originally posted by Tcmc:The government will never ban religious evangelism, whether it's by buddhists, hindus, muslims or christians.
But the govt has investigated and charged religious people before for evangelism that incites hate.
Last year, a christian couple was jailed for distributing material that tears down Islam and Catholicism.
2 pastors were also warned about inciting hate in their sermons.
Actually I dont agree to the police always meddling in our speech but in the context of Singapore and to preserve secularity, it might be the only good way to keep the over-zealous religious in check
They had the cheek to talk about freedom of speech and their rights, but dare to encourage threads that seems to be against them to be locked down immediately
It seems rights are supposed to be given to their lot and not others
Originally posted by laurence82:They had the cheek to talk about freedom of speech and their rights, but dare to encourage threads that seems to be against them to be locked down immediately
It seems rights are supposed to be given to their lot and not others
Well, what to do, we are in a christian forum and probably the moderators dont want us to discuss certain things.
I posted a friendly topic about similarities between jesus and buddha for interfaith purposes and they locked it too.
Originally posted by Tcmc:Well, what to do, we are in a christian forum and probably the moderators dont want us to discuss certain things.
I posted a friendly topic about similarities between jesus and buddha for interfaith purposes and they locked it too.
There are no moderators here, so whoever 'they' are, are just trolls
If you post a interfaith issue, for eg in Buddhism forum, they will be willing to discuss. If its xtian issue in Buddhism forum, they will politely ask u to go xtian forum
You will get none of these politeness here, mod or no mod
Originally posted by Tcmc:The government will never ban religious evangelism, whether it's by buddhists, hindus, muslims or christians.
But the govt has investigated and charged religious people before for evangelism that incites hate.
Last year, a christian couple was jailed for distributing material that tears down Islam and Catholicism.
2 pastors were also warned about inciting hate in their sermons.
Actually I dont agree to the police always meddling in our speech but in the context of Singapore and to preserve secularity, it might be the only good way to keep the over-zealous religious in check
Originally posted by Tcmc:Well, what to do, we are in a christian forum and probably the moderators dont want us to discuss certain things.
I posted a friendly topic about similarities between jesus and buddha for interfaith purposes and they locked it too.
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
Please explain to laurence why the govt will not ban evangelism. I think he needs another atheist to tell him why he is plain wrong. And while you are at it please explain to him also the Constitution Article 15(1).
Thats not the original pt
Pls do not divert as usual
Pls prove that banning evangelism is unlawful
Another atheist? In your opinion, why would i need to listen to an atheist, as compared to listening to Buddhist or Muslim?
Originally posted by laurence82:
Thats not the original ptPls do not divert as usual
Pls prove that banning evangelism is unlawful
Another atheist? In your opinion, why would i need to listen to an atheist, as compared to listening to Buddhist or Muslim?
You are not the Law nor do not have rights to make that law
Live with it.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Totally agreeThey dont care about arguments, debate or dare i say Christianity
They just want to go around trolling other forumers
Any christians, churches and pastors on the right track will not agree with their behaviour.
Originally posted by laurence82:You are not the Law nor do not have rights to make that law
Live with it.
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
It is precisely because I live with the law that I am free to evangelise, unlike you who seeks to go against the law as it now stands to ban evangelism. You should learn to be more tolerant towards the Christian faith.
The Singapore Constitution which i am under has not explicitly state so...which law are you under?
Tolerance towards xtian faith is a different issue, again, do not divert from issue at hand
Originally posted by laurence82:
The Singapore Constitution which i am under has not explicitly state so...which law are you under?
Tolerance towards xtian faith is a different issue, again, do not divert from issue at hand
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
Going la la la over Article 15(1) again laurence? Mind telling us what it says clearly? You clearly have little tolerance for the Christian faith, or else you will live and let live and not seek for evangelism to be banned.
You can tell, since you are the one propose banning evangelism is unlawful, and specifically tell us which part says its unlawful
Again, do not divert, once we clear this hurdle we can talk about 'tolerance' for the xtian faith if you like
Originally posted by laurence82:
You can tell, since you are the one propose banning evangelism is unlawful, and specifically tell us which part says its unlawfulAgain, do not divert, once we clear this hurdle we can talk about 'tolerance' for the xtian faith if you like
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
I can tell you that evangelism is lawful but you can't tell me that it is unlawful and thus need to be banned, or that it is lawful to have it banned.
all of the above did not even come up from original topic/discussion
pls quote the specific law that says banning evangelism is unlawful
Originally posted by laurence82:
all of the above did not even come up from original topic/discussionpls quote the specific law that says banning evangelism is unlawful
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
And go for another merry go round? Why waste time when you refuse to listen to anyone?
Why do i have to waste time reading your merry go round? You just need to justify the very first point you made, and all is well.
Lets cut the rest of your other attention diverting crap.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Why do i have to waste time reading your merry go round? You just need to justify the very first point you made, and all is well.Lets cut the rest of your other attention diverting crap.
Originally posted by BroInChrist:
It will be an exercise in futility to justify anything to someone who is hard of hearing and refuses to listen to others. BTW, I have already made the justification many posts ago. And others have tried to talk sense to you but to no avail.
Hard of hearing, refusal listen is not my concern
Please provide the specific proof that banning evangelism is unlawful
No dubious self interpretation or Oxford dictionary pls