Pastor’s wife lives lavishly in L.A.
-
Just a thought.
Sun Ho MTV is not cheap and she have to pay to produce it.
Without the financial support, she would not have make it.
She cannot afford it from her own.
No record company would want to sponsor her cos she is a nobody.
-
ABOMINATION!
Apart from the excesses, from the slutty persona she projects, I bet she's even made a cuckold of Kong Hee!
-
Well she's already 40 ...how long can she keep up with this?Nothing last forever
-
if that Slut Ho wants fame so badly, go totally nude in her MTV lah.............sure famous one !
so i wonder if she's paying big bucks for high class gigolos in LA.................so while hubby is scamming church members in S'pore, Slut Ho is screwing big black dicks in LA............
-
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:
if that Slut Ho wants fame so badly, go totally nude in her MTV lah.............sure famous one !
so i wonder if she's paying big bucks for high class gigolos in LA.................so while hubby is scamming church members in S'pore, Slut Ho is screwing big black dicks in LA............
Once she goes nude on mtv, she's finished as everything seen liao ma.... So she prefers to continue teasing.... wear provocatively..... suggestively..... flirting + arousing people.... so her value will stay high.......... AND at the same time bed the rich + famous ---> Earn $ discreetly - Kill many birds with one stone mah!
-
ther reason she had to go to US is because she is been boo by singaporean in her own country.
-
Originally posted by Hwaimeng:
ther reason she had to go to US is because she is been boo by singaporean in her own country.
For good reason.
-
hur....why she dye her hair blond ? so ugly.....
not to mention i never listen to any of her song.....no idea who she is.
If they got the money why not buy a house in Los Angeles?
Rent for $28k a months......typically if she stayed near the beach probably cost less and get a good view of the Pacific ocean....
-
Originally posted by hasene:
great, you are condoning his lifestyle! Basically christians will not accept this crap lol.
It is nothing at all to you but there is definitely something not right when a pastor owns 13 units of condo and ask the congregation to sell house to donate to church. Why does not he do so to set a good example?
The pastor does not own 13 units of condo. You have low comprehension.
You MUST increase your comprehension level.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
The pastor does not own 13 units of condo. You have low comprehension.
You MUST increase your comprehension level.
Read the article below on the purchase of 13 Units of condo by kong hee and ho. Don't tell me SPH published fake news. For credibility of this article , please feel free to contact SPH.You MUST increase your comprehension level. You have low comprehension. YOu love to believe in your own imagination that it is not true they bought 13 units of condo, you love to deprive yourself of accepting reality and facts. If you go on with this level, how you going to win souls for God?
Sep 29, 2007
<!-- headline one : start -->More parties fight to get in on Horizon Towers' appeal<!-- headline one : end -->Hearing delayed as judge has to decide if HPL, fresh group of owners can take part <!-- Author --> By Tan Hui Yee, Housing Correspondent
<!-- more than 7 paragraphs --><!-- story content : start -->
IT HAD all the elements of a classic courtroom drama - big bucks at stake, anxious owners and more lawyers than you could poke a stick at - but yesterday's Horizon Towers hearing was far from a stirring showdown.
The owners had gone to the High Court in a bid to overturn a Strata Titles Board (STB) ruling that aborted the collective sale of their Leonie Hill estate.
But lengthy argument involving a scrum of legal eagles - at least four senior counsel and six law firms turned up - over who could actually be involved in the proceedings threw a hefty spanner in the works.
Two groups wanted to be included but four other parties protested.
After about three hours of legal to and fro, Justice Choo Han Teck is expected to rule on Monday whether these groups can take part, which will mean the actual appeal hearing can start.
It centres on the STB's Aug 3 ruling that the sale application for the 210-unit condo was defective due to procedural errors.
<!-- show media links starting at 7th para -->The majority owners who signed the sale deal, represented by senior counsel Chelva Rajah from Tan, Rajah & Cheah, want that decision overturned.
But two other parties said they wanted to have their say as well.
One is a group of individuals - including pop star Ho Yeow Sun and her husband, Kong Hee - who own 13 units. All signed the sale deal and said they wanted to participate in the hearing to ensure the sale goes through.
The other is the consortium led by Hotel Properties (HPL) that signed the $500 million deal in February to buy the estate.
It maintains that the appeal outcome could affect the breach of contract suit it filed against the majority owners last month claiming lost profits of $800 million to $1 billion from the botched deal.
It had that suit adjourned on Thursday after the owners extended the sale deadline to Dec 11 but it is still 'alive'.
Its lawyer, Mr K. Shanmugam from Allen & Gledhill, argued that if the court ruled that the STB was wrong, it could be used by majority owners to 'white-wash' their alleged breach of contract.
'We, the purchaser, are the only real parties interested in seeing this contract through,' he said.
This rankled Mr Rajah, who argued that the majority owners were trying to get an appeal against the STB decision in order to fulfil the contract.
The consortium's application irked the group of more than 30 owners at court. At one point, murmurs of discontent rose from the gallery when Mr Shanmugam rose to speak.
Meanwhile, three separate lawyers for the minority owners who did not sign the sale agreement argued against the two groups joining the proceedings. They said it was unnecessary and would raise costs for everyone.
An owner, 53-year-old real estate developer Victor Ow, said later that he had not expected things to get so complicated.
'All of us like to be treated fairly...We shouldn't, as owners, be known in the market as greedy and as villains.'
Wonder if they used the church fund to buy the condo.
-
Originally posted by hasene:
Read the article below on the purchase of 13 Units of condo by kong hee and ho. Don't tell me SPH published fake news. For credibility of this article , please feel free to contact SPH.You MUST increase your comprehension level. You have low comprehension. YOu love to believe in your own imagination that it is not true they bought 13 units of condo, you love to deprive yourself of accepting reality and facts. If you go on with this level, how you going to win souls for God?
Sep 29, 2007
<!-- headline one : start -->More parties fight to get in on Horizon Towers' appeal<!-- headline one : end -->Hearing delayed as judge has to decide if HPL, fresh group of owners can take part <!-- Author --> By Tan Hui Yee, Housing Correspondent
<!-- more than 7 paragraphs --><!-- story content : start -->
IT HAD all the elements of a classic courtroom drama - big bucks at stake, anxious owners and more lawyers than you could poke a stick at - but yesterday's Horizon Towers hearing was far from a stirring showdown.
The owners had gone to the High Court in a bid to overturn a Strata Titles Board (STB) ruling that aborted the collective sale of their Leonie Hill estate.
But lengthy argument involving a scrum of legal eagles - at least four senior counsel and six law firms turned up - over who could actually be involved in the proceedings threw a hefty spanner in the works.
Two groups wanted to be included but four other parties protested.
After about three hours of legal to and fro, Justice Choo Han Teck is expected to rule on Monday whether these groups can take part, which will mean the actual appeal hearing can start.
It centres on the STB's Aug 3 ruling that the sale application for the 210-unit condo was defective due to procedural errors.
<!-- show media links starting at 7th para -->The majority owners who signed the sale deal, represented by senior counsel Chelva Rajah from Tan, Rajah & Cheah, want that decision overturned.
But two other parties said they wanted to have their say as well.
One is a group of individuals - including pop star Ho Yeow Sun and her husband, Kong Hee - who own 13 units. All signed the sale deal and said they wanted to participate in the hearing to ensure the sale goes through.
The other is the consortium led by Hotel Properties (HPL) that signed the $500 million deal in February to buy the estate.
It maintains that the appeal outcome could affect the breach of contract suit it filed against the majority owners last month claiming lost profits of $800 million to $1 billion from the botched deal.
It had that suit adjourned on Thursday after the owners extended the sale deadline to Dec 11 but it is still 'alive'.
Its lawyer, Mr K. Shanmugam from Allen & Gledhill, argued that if the court ruled that the STB was wrong, it could be used by majority owners to 'white-wash' their alleged breach of contract.
'We, the purchaser, are the only real parties interested in seeing this contract through,' he said.
This rankled Mr Rajah, who argued that the majority owners were trying to get an appeal against the STB decision in order to fulfil the contract.
The consortium's application irked the group of more than 30 owners at court. At one point, murmurs of discontent rose from the gallery when Mr Shanmugam rose to speak.
Meanwhile, three separate lawyers for the minority owners who did not sign the sale agreement argued against the two groups joining the proceedings. They said it was unnecessary and would raise costs for everyone.
An owner, 53-year-old real estate developer Victor Ow, said later that he had not expected things to get so complicated.
'All of us like to be treated fairly...We shouldn't, as owners, be known in the market as greedy and as villains.'
Wonder if they used the church fund to buy the condo.
The article did not state the exact number in this group of individuals but it includes the pastor and his wife.
So, you think it's only the pastor and his wife in the group who owns 13 units?
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
The article did not state the exact number in this group of individuals but it includes the pastor and his wife.
So, you think it's only the pastor and his wife in the group who owns 13 units?
I have suggested you to call SPH for it. I am not the one who wrote the article, if you are extremely unhappy with the article that stated that they bought 13 units, go call SPH.Don't attempt to start any flame war with me, I am not interested.
The article has nothing to do with my comprehension. So stop using personal attack against me when I have posted nothing to flame or bash you. Please repent so that you will not be faultfinding and focus on how you can reach out to people to preach the gospel. Preaching the gospel is the command from God/Jesus.
Enough said.
-
Originally posted by hasene:
I have suggested you to call SPH for it. I am not the one who wrote the article, if you are extremely unhappy with the article that stated that they bought 13 units, go call SPH.Don't attempt to start any flame war with me, I am not interested.
The article has nothing to do with my comprehension. So stop using personal attack against me when I have posted nothing to flame or bash you. Please repent so that you will not be faultfinding and focus on how you can reach out to people to preach the gospel. Preaching the gospel is the command from God/Jesus.
Enough said.
i think you need to read it properly, it is the group who owns 13 units and in that group are the kongs...the reporter in this case i reckon was trying to sensationalise things....if indeed they did own 13 units, the recent new paper article 2 days ago doing their housing history would have reported so, instead it stated only 1 unit, paid for in $1 million, it is one thing to draw the truth quite another to want to report half truths for your personal agenda.
-
Originally posted by dukedracula:
i think you need to read it properly, it is the group who owns 13 units and in that group are the kongs...the reporter in this case i reckon was trying to sensationalise things....if indeed they did own 13 units, the recent new paper article 2 days ago doing their housing history would have reported so, instead it stated only 1 unit, paid for in $1 million, it is one thing to draw the truth quite another to want to report half truths for your personal agenda.
STop pointing fingers at me, I merely posted the article here. Whether it is one unit or 13 units as reported in the article,go ask SPH, don't attack me. Damn it.
You are barking at the wrong tree. Stop your nuisance!
If you think it is not true or whatever, go bring SPH to court.
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
The article did not state the exact number in this group of individuals but it includes the pastor and his wife.
So, you think it's only the pastor and his wife in the group who owns 13 units?
googoo..........
don't tell me you're one of the mindless, brainwashed goons that gave your monthly taxes to CHC ???
no need to be embarrassed about it and then deny that Slut Ho and hubby are using your cash to enjoy the high life mah !
you are one of the many victims mah, no need to feel bad.............just be MAD.........!
-
Originally posted by Asromanista2001:
googoo..........
don't tell me you're one of the mindless, brainwashed goons that gave your monthly taxes to CHC ???
no need to be embarrassed about it and then deny that Slut Ho and hubby are using your cash to enjoy the high life mah !
you are one of the many victims mah, no need to feel bad.............just be MAD.........!
I do not contribute to CHC.
Sun Ho did not use the public's money, unlike Venerable Mingyi.
Sour grapes are a dime a dozen here.
-
Some people are asking if they believe what they preach.
If giving away money helps to generate 30, 60 , 100 fold returns, then how come they don't give away everything they own to generate greater returns?
-
Originally posted by hasene:
They own 13 units which they bought from HPL. I have posted this article in the other threadOh my word!
I WANT TO ROB THEM!!!
-
Originally posted by hasene:
STop pointing fingers at me, I merely posted the article here. Whether it is one unit or 13 units as reported in the article,go ask SPH, don't attack me. Damn it.
You are barking at the wrong tree. Stop your nuisance!
If you think it is not true or whatever, go bring SPH to court.
why so hostile? i'm merely correcting your error, i don't care for the kongs but that doesn't mean i should be party to falsely accusing them for something they didn't do...
-
Originally posted by Honeybunz:
Oh my word!
I WANT TO ROB THEM!!!
lets do it!
unlike ministers with multi million dollar salaries, i am sure pastors with multi million dollar in the bank accounts do not have machine gun toting security guards
-
its quite common to buy fame to get more wealth which in turn buying more fame with more money pumping from somewhere....esp one has dreams of hollywood...or almost getting there....
-
Fame, Wealth, Prestige.....
-
Originally posted by googoomuck:
I do not contribute to CHC.
Sun Ho did not use the public's money, unlike Venerable Mingyi.
Sour grapes are a dime a dozen here.
how you know Slut Ho not using church money ?
don't tell me you've been sleeping with that farking ugly horse-face slut ???
son't tell me she has the money to promote her career for so long over the years ???
if she so rich, why bother trying to be a singer ???
nobody except for goons from her church will buy her CDs...............as for her songs, i'll rather listen to a bunch of dogs FARTING !
-
Originally posted by hasene:
STop pointing fingers at me, I merely posted the article here. Whether it is one unit or 13 units as reported in the article,go ask SPH, don't attack me. Damn it.
You are barking at the wrong tree. Stop your nuisance!
If you think it is not true or whatever, go bring SPH to court.
while i do agree with dukedracula, i also do not want to be dissing u, nor am i interested in defending the character of kong hee and spouse.
this is a classic example of reading our presuppositions into the "evidence", in this case, the article. From your post above, you didnt just merely post the article here, you claimed, as in another earlier post that they did own 13 units, "Read the article below on the purchase of 13 Units of condo by kong hee and ho. Don't tell me SPH published fake news."
SPH reported correctly. It was your interpretation that was flawed. There is a way in which it can be construed that the couple did own 13 units but this is not it.
In any case, just wanted to highlight this as careless reading due to our prejudices. This happens to everyone (including scientists and theologians). no malice intended here.
-
There's a common religion in our world they are capitalism:)