by who and how they choose leh?Originally posted by davidche:If i didnt remember wrong. The bible had many books but only 66 were chosen.
Wrong, dave. The Bible has 66 books. Period.Originally posted by davidche:If i didnt remember wrong. The bible had many books but only 66 were chosen.
Dave's latest blunder.Originally posted by Chin Eng:Wrong, dave. The Bible has 66 books. Period.
rest assured that it will not be his last.Originally posted by Icemoon:Dave's latest blunder.
Never mind .. we all learn from mistakes.
dave .. prove unker wrong!Originally posted by Chin Eng:rest assured that it will not be his last.
this one should be quite do-able.... but it's only Monday....Originally posted by Icemoon:dave .. prove unker wrong!
at least prove him wrong for the rest of the week.
The DVC is sprouting nonsense.Originally posted by pwnz0r:This has a bit of controvesy and in the world of non-believers, further fueled by the Da Vinci Code.
Originally posted by Chin Eng:this one should be quite do-able.... but it's only Monday....
There were many books, but only 66 were chosen and they formed - the bible.Originally posted by Chin Eng:Wrong, dave. The Bible has 66 books. Period.
There were many books written but because of a series of selection criteria, the books we have now are considered Holy Scripture.
Originally posted by davidche:There were many books, but only 66 were chosen and they formed - the bible.
Am i correct.
got differenceOriginally posted by davidche:If i didnt remember wrong. The bible had many books but only 66 were chosen.
ya. I wrote wrongly. As Vince has suggested, i should have read it again before officially posting it here.Originally posted by laurence82:got difference
Right on target.Originally posted by davidche:There were many books, but only 66 were chosen and they formed - the bible.
Am i correct.
don't worry dave, I am not after your blood.Originally posted by davidche:ya. I wrote wrongly. As Vince has suggested, i should have read it again before officially posting it here.
who? dave?Originally posted by laurence82:I still believe he is a troll, unless otherwise proven.