Not sure about that, but i am refering to foodOriginally posted by SingaporeMacross:'Wanton', if I'm not wrong, can also refer to a loose woman.
haha, i remember one of my secondary school teachers teaching that.Originally posted by laurence82:On the same line, if you know your Hokkien well, its never advisable to call pretty gals chio bu.
go back and play ur game larOriginally posted by laoda99:What is a flying wanton?
Wanton Mee?
game sianzzz liao alsoOriginally posted by laurence82:go back and play ur game lar
then time to pack your bag for schoolOriginally posted by laoda99:game sianzzz liao also
fren jio me play but now he stop liao
no lah... its deep fried wanton.. crispy type...Originally posted by laoda99:What is a flying wanton?
Wanton Mee?
still looking at the stars?Originally posted by M©+square:
What then does the word of God written in the Bible says?Originally posted by SingaporeMacross:ah.
how do we explain the contradictory beliefs held by different groups then?
what? check the Scripture like the Bereans?Originally posted by vince69:What then does the word of God written in the Bible says?
right on target.... cause only God's word can be used as the standard... the rest (including Church's teaching, traditions) cannot. so if differ from standard, then is questionable lah...Originally posted by Icemoon:what? check the Scripture like the Bereans?
reply msg : Got it thanks. I still prefer admiring the constellations.Originally posted by vince69:still looking at the stars?
*psst... you do know I had packed a nice compass and a fully updated GPS receiver in the survial kit I passed to you right?
need my help? I'm quite pro at this.Originally posted by M©+square:reply msg : Got it thanks. I still prefer admiring the constellations.
Let me do that for awhile more ...
That portion of verses seem to imply all that we need to know is contained in Scripture.Originally posted by vince69:right on target.... cause only God's word can be used as the standard... the rest (including Church's teaching, traditions) cannot. so if differ from standard, then is questionable lah...
which one you talking aboutOriginally posted by Icemoon:That portion of verses seem to imply all that we need to know is contained in Scripture.
The rest is unnecessary.
the one you said I am right on target.Originally posted by vince69:which one you talking about
Oh, that one, about the Bereans, yes, in this case, the verse is not regardingOriginally posted by Icemoon:the one you said I am right on target.
Pro at admiring stars????Originally posted by Icemoon:need my help? I'm quite pro at this.
Actually Paul was teaching from the OT? So he was not teaching about Christ?Originally posted by vince69:Oh, that one, about the Bereans, yes, in this case, the verse is not regarding
or implying all that we need to know is contained in Scripture, its about Paul praising them for beind diligent in searching the scripture to check if what Paul is teaching is inline with the scriptural truths/principles, the scriptures from which Paul claims to teach from.
example will be like... if someone (be he a pastor or priest) come along and says, Jesus taught this and that principles....etc, we then should go back to the Bible and check if this is really so.
I am giving an example lah.Originally posted by Icemoon:Actually Paul was teaching from the OT? So he was not teaching about Christ?
ya.Originally posted by M©+square:Pro at admiring stars????
When i admire something, i don't people yakking away one leh....Originally posted by Icemoon:ya.
what example?Originally posted by vince69:I am giving an example lah.
not ya, but yes?Originally posted by M©+square:When i admire something, i don't people yakking away one leh....
the part where I mention about Jesus, I started it off with the word "example"Originally posted by Icemoon:what example?
I'm asking if the Bereans were checking on Scripture, then it couldn't be about Christ directly?