It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
Originally posted by Y_Shun:TS, take a paper & write down, "I'm sorry, sgforums" with your username as the signature. we will probably considering forgiving you and remove your number.
if you insists on your "my points are valid" type of argument, i think you can continue to have some sex offers sms on your phone.
Just checking, if he had done that, would you really have the power to have remove the ad?
The main reason why this thread has gone on for so many pages is because of the topic title "SGForums fucking sucks", which a lot of you have taken very personally.
What started as a complaint about the forum system has become something else altogether.
well, if mods are arbitary, what he or you do about it? cry like a baby demanding justice? start to grow up and live in the real world where there is no mod-on-demand just like there is video-on-demand
this is where a lot of ''éducated'' singaporeans fail
they think the world revolves around them because they got paper cert and they can get things by demanding and complaining
一点家教都没有
it's suspicious now
da-vid looks like a clone of SomebodyInSG
And look at this statement
The moderators are obligated to help me, idiot.
Wow! Moderators here are not even paid, and they are obligated to help? For what? Immature kid.
And I'm quite confident that if I sue SGForums for allowing me to be constantly harassed by phone calls due to the fact that they refused to remove my phone number from their website even after I asked nicely twice, I would win.
Go ahead and get a lawyer to do so then. All talk only, zero action.
I'll gladly leave this hellhole forever.
Good riddance
Originally posted by laurence82:well, if mods are arbitary, what he or you do about it? cry like a baby demanding justice? start to grow up and live in the real world where there is no mod-on-demand just like there is video-on-demand
this is where a lot of ''éducated'' singaporeans fail
they think the world revolves around them because they got paper cert and they can get things by demanding and complaining
一点家教都没有
Right or wrong, whether we agree with it or not, I am just stating how it is. Your reply seems to imply it is.
And it is not about being "educated", about having certs or whatever. Pretty irrelevant that.
I know you are just trying to defend your friend or whatever, but that comment about not being taught properly by family is personal and irrelevant. Ironic too.
In any case, you are bringing this discussion in a different direction altogether. I've said what I've intended to say. Move on?
Boh conclusion ah?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Right or wrong, whether we agree with it or not, I am just stating how it is. Your reply seems to imply it is.
And it is not about being "educated", about having certs or whatever. Pretty irrelevant that.
I know you are just trying to defend your friend or whatever, but that comment about not being taught properly by family is personal and irrelevant. Ironic too.
In any case, you are bringing this discussion in a different direction altogether. I've said what I've intended to say. Move on?
So, it is right moderators are not obliged or required by rules to help, i agree.
Its relevant to da-vid, not to your reply.
I dont know about anyone being a friend, yes, it is personal, seeing as to how da-vid like to fuck around and call us retard.
Same direction, i dont see any difference.
Originally posted by Midlusionz:Boh conclusion ah?
Most of us agree TS is a retard, hence this is the conclusion.
Originally posted by laurence82:
Most of us agree TS is a retard, hence this is the conclusion.
I totally agree
I wonder how TS asked the mods
If he was as rude as he was like this entire thread, I doubt they will do anything about it.
So far, my requests for thread removal had been very prompt
Originally posted by elindra:I wonder how TS asked the mods
If he was as rude as he was like this entire thread, I doubt they will do anything about it.
So far, my requests for thread removal had been very prompt
I would too, but only to people with 家教
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:Just checking, if he had done that, would you really have the power to have remove the ad?
tbh, actually no! but the moderators might consider!
Originally posted by Gensis:it's suspicious now
da-vid looks like a clone of SomebodyInSG
And look at this statement
Wow! Moderators here are not even paid, and they are obligated to help? For what? Immature kid.
Go ahead and get a lawyer to do so then. All talk only, zero action.
Good riddance
really suspicious!
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:It does not matter whether you like him or not, whether the person is your friend or not, but policy should be applied uniformly and not so based on a whim or your fancies.
Real life that is quite hard to achieve. look at our local politics, opposition all sue until bankrupt, lee family members all top positions in government, GLCs.
It's hard in real life to be fair in such things.
ho ching lose billions, but still CEO of Temasek, Chee for no fucking reason get sacked by uni.
real world is like that one lah.
Who has power wins, like the old fucking bastard.
So.. who is going to be the martyr of change ?
......
Nobody ?
I thought so.
lol
Originally posted by BadzMaro:So.. who is going to be the martyr of change ?
JBJ? Chee? Chia?
the reason why TS was sabotaged can clearly be explained thru the tone of TS's posts TS has made on this thread. if TS's mother was sane, she would have diced TS's tongue and cooked curry with it.
Cook curry but cannot eat it. The curry should only be used to mask the foul smell.
Eat already your mouth and tongue will be just as foul...
tsk tsk tsk, after reading i can only say 狗改�了�屎
It is just the culture here, wahahahahha!
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
since when admin come in n add sarcastic remarks?
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:And usually once objective is met, complaint is settled or whatever, thread is closed as "case closed" or whatever. Yet in this case topic is allowed to continue.
Oversight? Or just arbitary judgement to allow people to lamblast somebody who has said negative things about sgforums, be it he is right or wrong about his comments.
yes. case close. n we r already doing our own chatting. wad has the chatting gotta do with u or TS? tink u n/or TS are taking it personally.
Originally posted by SomebodyInSG:It is amazing how threads and topics about friends of the admin can get deleted or shifted quickly, yet such things involving personal info does not get acted upon promptly even after notification via open forum.
And the admin can even add sarcastic remarks and all.
This double standard is amazing and shows how arbitary the role of admin is within sgforums.
Prove that topics about friends of the admin get deleted quickly? I believe non closure of this thread is fair, based on attitude of the user.
Admin are humans, so yes, they can add sarcastic remarks.
i dont see any double standard applied since there is no proof.
ah lau.. nvmd lah... ppl jealous we da qing ma qiao... 3some... hahah~